Because new ideas are overrated, Columbia Pictures is
bringing us yet another "Men in Black" movie. True to uninspired sequel form, this time
around Agent J (Will Smith) must travel back to the past to save his partner. During
his journey he'll face countless time travel clichés and plot holes. Despite
the “not again” smeared all over this storyline, is there a chance that the
third time's the charm?
To start, great acting has never been a problem for the
"Men in Black" series. Will Smith and Tommy Lee Jones roll up to this
movie with all their skills hanging out. Newcomer Josh Brolin more than fills
the role of Young Agent K — his portrayal of Tommy Lee Jones is terrifyingly
accurate. The banter between Agent K and J is, as it's always been, the
highlight of the film. Every moment they’re together you bottle your laughter
to make sure you don't miss the next punch line. Jemaine Clement, who plays the
toothy and villainous Boris the Animal, is less up to snuff. His story and
dialogue are generic and the actor brings nothing to the role to make it
unique.
The story is just as generic as the trailers imply. Agent
J travels back in time to save his partner and thus prevent an alien invasion.
Along the way he'll see the secrets of his partner’s past, and learn a few
things about his own. There are very few surprises, but the ones that are there
are enough to keep the film moving and give it heart. Time traveling also
provides nonstop moments for comedy. Whether it's blatant comments on Andy
Warhol's paintings or more subtle visual cues, there are plenty of laughs.
Sadly, "Men in Black 3" also has many flaws. Several of the questions early on go either unexplained or are totally underwhelming. The story isn’t friendly to new fans, and there is very little explanation of the characters. It’s best to watch to first two before seeing this one. Fans of the original will also be disappointed that some of the plot of the first two are completely ignored.
So is "Men in Black 3" the intergalactic
success this series deserves? No. It fails to fill the shoes of the first film,
but is light years beyond the second film. Great acting, an amazing script and
bizarre situations make this a fun experience that should be seen.
3.5 "Neuralizers" out of 5
Writing and Image by Chris
Edited by Aaron
No comments:
Post a Comment